The Author Discusses all of the Following Arguments in the Passage, Except: (i) Sceptics Believe that We can Never fully know anything - Bzziii.com
Reading Comprehension
The author discusses all of the following arguments in the passage, EXCEPT:
(i) sceptics believe that we can never fully know anything, if by “knowing” we mean knowledge of a reality that is independent of the knower.
(ii) the best way to deal with scepticism about the veracity of knowledge is to ignore it
(iii) philosophers maintain that the scandal of philosophy should be of concern to everyone.
(iv) if we cannot distinguish knowledge from opinion or delusion, we will not be able to justify our actions.
(i) sceptics believe that we can never fully know anything, if by “knowing” we mean knowledge of a reality that is independent of the knower.
(ii) the best way to deal with scepticism about the veracity of knowledge is to ignore it
(iii) philosophers maintain that the scandal of philosophy should be of concern to everyone.
(iv) if we cannot distinguish knowledge from opinion or delusion, we will not be able to justify our actions.
(ii) the best way to deal with scepticism about the veracity of knowledge is to ignore it.
Option 1 is correct because this is what the embarrassment of principle implies. Choice 2 is the correct response on the grounds that the manufacturer doesn't talk about it. He talks about disregarding something, yet it's not "on the most efficient way to handle unreliability". He says that we can never know the truth of things, so the most widely recognized way for individuals to handle it is to ignore it. Thus, option 2 is wrong, as the manufacturer does not talk about this in the section. Both 3 and 4 are talked about in the main section.
Comments
Post a Comment