Directions for Summary: A Paragraph is Followed by Four Options Which Have Summarized the Passage in Their Own Way. Pick the Option that Best Summarizes the Passage - Bzziii
Directions for Summary: A paragraph is followed by four options which have summarized
the passage in their own way. Pick the option that best summarizes the passage:
McGurk and MacDonald (1976) reported a powerful multisensory illusion occurring with audio-visual speech. They recorded a voice articulating a consonant ‘ba-ba-ba’ and dubbed it with a face articulating another consonant ‘ga-ga-ga’. Even though the acoustic speech signal was well recognized alone, it was heard as another consonant after dubbing with incongruent visual speech i.e., ‘da-da-da’. The illusion, termed as the McGurk effect, has been replicated many times, and it has sparked an abundance of research. The reason for the great impact is that this is a striking demonstration of multisensory integration, where that auditory and visual information is merged into a unified, integrated percept.
(i) When the quality of auditory information is poor, the visual information wins over the auditory information.
(ii) When the auditory speech signal does not match the visual speech movements, the acoustic speech signal is confusing and integration of the two is imperfect.
(iii) The McGurk effect which is a demonstration of multisensory integration has been replicated many times.
(iv) Visual speech mismatched with auditory speech can result in the perception of an entirely different message: this illusion is known as the McGurk effect.
McGurk and MacDonald (1976) reported a powerful multisensory illusion occurring with audio-visual speech. They recorded a voice articulating a consonant ‘ba-ba-ba’ and dubbed it with a face articulating another consonant ‘ga-ga-ga’. Even though the acoustic speech signal was well recognized alone, it was heard as another consonant after dubbing with incongruent visual speech i.e., ‘da-da-da’. The illusion, termed as the McGurk effect, has been replicated many times, and it has sparked an abundance of research. The reason for the great impact is that this is a striking demonstration of multisensory integration, where that auditory and visual information is merged into a unified, integrated percept.
(i) When the quality of auditory information is poor, the visual information wins over the auditory information.
(ii) When the auditory speech signal does not match the visual speech movements, the acoustic speech signal is confusing and integration of the two is imperfect.
(iii) The McGurk effect which is a demonstration of multisensory integration has been replicated many times.
(iv) Visual speech mismatched with auditory speech can result in the perception of an entirely different message: this illusion is known as the McGurk effect.
(iv) Visual speech mismatched with auditory speech can result in the perception of an
entirely different message: this illusion is known as the McGurk effect.
The passage talks about two different voices with two different voices producing a different sound. This illusion is called the McGook effect. Option 1 incorrectly limits the discussion to "auditory information quality", which is not a concern of the passage. Option 2 confuses the two dissonant auditory speech with one auditory speech and one visual speech movements. This is not what the path wants to say. Option 3 is close, but talks about multisensory integration without going into any detail about it. Choice 4 is the best summary.
Comments
Post a Comment