Biologists Who Publish their Research Directly to the Web Have been Labelled as “rogue”, But Physicists Have Been Routinely Publishing Research digitally (“preprints”)
Directions for Summary: A paragraph is followed by four options which have summarized
the passage in their own way. Pick the option that best summarizes the passage:
Biologists who publish their research directly to the Web have been labelled as “rogue”, but physicists have been routinely publishing research digitally (“preprints”), prior to submitting in a peer-reviewed journal. Advocates of preprints argue that quick and open dissemination of research speeds up scientific progress and allows for wider access to knowledge. But some journals still don’t accept research previously published as a preprint. Even if the idea of preprints is gaining ground, one of the biggest barriers for biologists is how they would be viewed by members of their conservative research community.
(i) One of the advantages of digital preprints of research is they hasten the dissemination process, but these are not accepted by most scientific communities.
(ii) Compared to biologists, physicists are less conservative in their acceptance of digital prepublication of research papers, which allows for faster dissemination of knowledge.
(iii) Preprints of research are frowned on by some scientific fields as they do not undergo a rigorous reviewing process but are accepted among biologists as a quick way to disseminate information.
(iv) While digital publication of research is gaining popularity in many scientific disciplines, almost all peer-reviewed journals are reluctant to accept papers that have been published before.
Biologists who publish their research directly to the Web have been labelled as “rogue”, but physicists have been routinely publishing research digitally (“preprints”), prior to submitting in a peer-reviewed journal. Advocates of preprints argue that quick and open dissemination of research speeds up scientific progress and allows for wider access to knowledge. But some journals still don’t accept research previously published as a preprint. Even if the idea of preprints is gaining ground, one of the biggest barriers for biologists is how they would be viewed by members of their conservative research community.
(i) One of the advantages of digital preprints of research is they hasten the dissemination process, but these are not accepted by most scientific communities.
(ii) Compared to biologists, physicists are less conservative in their acceptance of digital prepublication of research papers, which allows for faster dissemination of knowledge.
(iii) Preprints of research are frowned on by some scientific fields as they do not undergo a rigorous reviewing process but are accepted among biologists as a quick way to disseminate information.
(iv) While digital publication of research is gaining popularity in many scientific disciplines, almost all peer-reviewed journals are reluctant to accept papers that have been published before.
(ii) Compared to biologists, physicists are less conservative in their acceptance of digital prepublication of research papers, which allows for faster dissemination of knowledge.
Option 2 accurately states this qualification. As such it is the most ideal decision. Option 1 ignores removing this qualification. Option 3 incorrectly expresses that scientists are hasty to accept research as carefully distributed. A similar error is resolved by Decision 4 which says "All friends hesitate to accept assessed diary papers..."
Comments
Post a Comment